Impossible Toronto

On the Courtyard

Learning from

European Blocks

Studio VAARO
Gabriel Fain Architects

On the Courtyard draws European courtyard blocks onto real Toronto lots in full architectural detail and finds the regulatory reasons they are impossible to build. Visualization by Aron Lorincz Ateliers.

Download

Impossible Toronto

Imagining constructive alternatives to the current reality remains a cultural challenge. Impossible Toronto, through its inaugural project, On the Courtyard, counters this creative hurdle by exploring a design vision. The goal is not to offer definitive solutions: no one typology can be a silver bullet that “fixes” the city. But we can take steps toward reimagining Toronto’s future. On the Courtyard is one such step; further explorations will be needed as Toronto continues to learn about what built forms suit this city and the particularities of its future.

Should any of this vision strike a chord, this project includes a practical guide to regulatory barriers that make the European courtyard block impossible to build in Toronto today—a punch list of obstacles, if you will. Every design choice sketched here is possible and exists somewhere. Impossible Toronto is, then, a pragmatic invitation to think bigger, an attempt to articulate what it might look like to have a city that functions well, supports its people, and aims for beauty. Imagining might just be the chaotic first step toward making the impossible possible and the possible real.

On the Courtyard

On the Courtyard is, first and foremost, a design proposal and a starting point for further conversation. The goal is to work in an imaginative rather than incremental register—to highlight the broad scale of changes that are needed if this type of construction is to become possible in Toronto. We do this in the hope that, one day in the near future, the crusade to champion missing-middle construction will prevail. When it does, the courtyard block will be waiting.

Topic
Status
Reason
Solution
Single Stair
Impossible
Building Code
Permit single egress in Part 3 and Part 9 buildings up to six storeys
Unprotected Stair
Impossible
Building Code
Align with European codes to allow single-egress stairs to be open to the corridors and unprotected (unsprinklered)
Small Elevator
Impossible
Building Code & Standards (CSA)
Align with European codes to permit smaller elevators for buildings up to six storeys
No Sprinklers
Impossible
Building Code
Review building codes to allow for combustible construction without the need for sprinklers
Reduced Setbacks
Impossible
Zoning/Bylaw
Remove side-yard setback requirements entirely and reduce front and rear-yard setbacks for multiplexes and apartment buildings up to six storeys
Density
Impossible
Zoning/Bylaw
Amend zoning bylaw to increase FSI so multiple buildings can be developed more easily on a single or a double lot
Building Height
Impossible
Zoning/Bylaw
Amend zoning bylaw to increase building height for six-storey buildings to facilitate mass-timber construction; increase height of laneway buildings to four storeys
Angular Planes
Impossible
Zoning/Bylaw
Amend zoning bylaw to remove angular planes for laneway buildings
Commercial Space in Laneway
Impossible
Zoning/Bylaw
Amend zoning bylaw to permit retail uses in laneways
Bike Storage
Impossible
Zoning/Bylaw
Amend zoning bylaw to permit alternative bicycle storage solutions
Amenity Space
Impossible
Zoning/Bylaw
Amend zoning bylaw to facilitate performance based/site specific amenity space requirements
Waste Rooms
Impossible
Zoning/Bylaw
Amend zoning bylaw requirements for size of waste room and allow for alternative storage and waste collection solutions
Density Landscaping/ Soil Volumes
Impossible
Zoning/Bylaw
Allow for a block-wide landscape approach to soil volumes, soft landscape and tree requirements
Utilities
Impossible
Municipal Engineering & Construction Services
Establish a block-wide infrastructural approach to servicing (i.e., to avoid pad mount transformer requirements on small sites)

Conclusion

The Impossible Toronto framing device gave us a valuable opportunity to set aside the usual technical, financial, and regulatory limitations that often hinder ambitious architectural thinking. What might initially appear unachievable can, with closer scrutiny, reveal itself to be unexpectedly within reach and worth reaching for—especially when a strong idea begins to gather support and inspire broader public enthusiasm for change.

We hope that On the Courtyard helps Torontonians reconsider how they live and build in the city and helps them envision a future in which urban planning goes beyond simply increasing housing supply, aiming instead to foster vibrant, high-quality communities.

With a thoughtful and integrated approach, we can open the door to design solutions that not only provide more homes but also improve the overall livability of the city.

We don’t claim to have all the answers. In fact, this project raises important questions—that, perhaps, bring us closer to understanding the one question underlying all the others: Why can’t we have this at home?